<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Kommentare zu: C# SHA256 hashing in 2024	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://robbelroot.de/blog/csharp-sha256-hashing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://robbelroot.de/blog/csharp-sha256-hashing/</link>
	<description>alias RobbelRoot – Freelance Full Stack Developer .NET</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:55:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Von: RobbelRoot		</title>
		<link>https://robbelroot.de/blog/csharp-sha256-hashing/#comment-1143</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RobbelRoot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2023 22:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://robbelroot.de/?p=10777#comment-1143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Als Antwort auf &lt;a href=&quot;https://robbelroot.de/blog/csharp-sha256-hashing/#comment-1142&quot;&gt;Alvin Raul Szöke&lt;/a&gt;.

Your comment isn&#039;t right and pretty flat, without explanation. Since .NET 5 there are static methods, yes, but how am I supposed to inject different hash algos by dependency injection with static things? And those ComputeHash-Methods are more or less just aliases. Even though CA1850 recommends using the static counterparties, I’ll stay with the ComputeHash approach to stay DI ready (easily / without making a wrapper class). I will add this thought process to the blog post, so everyone can decide on his own.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Als Antwort auf <a href="https://robbelroot.de/blog/csharp-sha256-hashing/#comment-1142">Alvin Raul Szöke</a>.</p>
<p>Your comment isn&#8217;t right and pretty flat, without explanation. Since .NET 5 there are static methods, yes, but how am I supposed to inject different hash algos by dependency injection with static things? And those ComputeHash-Methods are more or less just aliases. Even though CA1850 recommends using the static counterparties, I’ll stay with the ComputeHash approach to stay DI ready (easily / without making a wrapper class). I will add this thought process to the blog post, so everyone can decide on his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Von: Alvin Raul Szöke		</title>
		<link>https://robbelroot.de/blog/csharp-sha256-hashing/#comment-1142</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alvin Raul Szöke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2023 20:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://robbelroot.de/?p=10777#comment-1142</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is not the correct way to implement hashing. Use `SHA256.HashData` instead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not the correct way to implement hashing. Use `SHA256.HashData` instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
